AMD FX-4350 vs AMD A8-6600K

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks

-VS-

CPU lineage

AMD FX-4350 or AMD FX-4350 – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The AMD FX-4350 features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q2/2013 and belongs to the 2 generation of the AMD FX series.
To use the AMD FX-4350, you'll need a motherboard with a AM3+ socket.
The AMD A8-6600K features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q2/2013 and belongs to the 3 generation of the AMD A series.
To use the AMD A8-6600K, you'll need a motherboard with a FM2 socket.
AMD FX-4350 Name AMD A8-6600K
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
AMD FX Family AMD A
AMD FX-4300 Group AMD A8-6000
2 Generation 3
 
 

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD FX-4350 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD FX-4350 is 4.2 GHz
and turbo frequency for one core is 4.3 GHz.
The AMD A8-6600K has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD A8-6600K is 3.9 GHz
and turbo frequency for one core is 4.2 GHz.
No Hyperthreading No
4x Cores 4x
4.3 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 core) 4.2 GHz
normal Core architecture normal
4.3 GHz Turbo Frequency (all cores) 4.2 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
4 Threads 4
4.2 GHz Frequency 3.9 GHz
4 CPU Cores 4
 
 

Internal Graphics

The AMD FX-4350 does not have integrated graphics.
The AMD A8-6600K has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short.
Specifically, the AMD A8-6600K uses the AMD Radeon HD 8570D, which has 256 texture shaders
and 4 execution units.
The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
-- GPU frequency 0.84 GHz
0 bytes Max. GPU Memory 2.0 GB
-- GPU (Turbo) --
GPU name AMD Radeon HD 8570D
-- Generation 5
-- Direct X 11.2
-- Release date Q2/2013
-- Shaders 256
-- Max. displays --
-- Technology 32 nm
-- Execution units 4
 
 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

-- AI specifications --
-- AI hardware --
 
 

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
-- h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
-- VP9 No
-- AV1 No
-- h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
-- AVC Decode
-- VC-1 Decode
-- h264 Decode
-- JPEG Decode / Encode
-- VP8 No
 
 

Memory & PCIe

pci PCIe pci
-- Bandwidth --
Yes AES-NI Yes
0 bytes Max. Memory 0 bytes
Yes ECC No
2 Memory channels 2
DDR3-1866 Memory type DDR3-1866
 
 

Thermal Management

The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 125 W watts.
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself.
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W watts.
125 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 100 W
-- Tjunction max --
 
 

Technical details

The AMD FX-4350 is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 8.0 MB cache.
A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming.
The AMD A8-6600K is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 4.0 MB cache.
AM3+ Socket FM2
0 bytes L2-Cache 0 bytes
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
8.0 MB L3-Cache 4.0 MB
100 $ Release price 85 $
-- Chip design --
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
Q2/2013 Release date Q2/2013
Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture Richland (Piledriver)
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
Technical data sheet Documents Technical data sheet
32 nm Technology 32 nm
-- Part Number --
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
 
 

Benchmarks